Spending weeks manually reading policy PDFs, extracting control statements, and mapping them across ISO 27001, PCI DSS, HIPAA, an error prone process that doesn't scale.
A compliance officer uploads a corporate security policy PDF. The system parses the document, digitizes it into structured control statements, and automatically maps them to selected compliance frameworks. The officer reviews the coverage percentages and identifies unmapped controls for refinement.
PDFControl MappingFrameworkGoing into audits blind with no central view of which controls have adequate policy backing. Teams scramble for evidence and miss low confidence mappings until the auditor finds them.
Before a scheduled ISO 27001 surveillance audit, the internal auditor reviews the Readiness Dashboard to assess policy coverage across all frameworks. They filter by framework, inspect which controls have adequate policy backing, and identify low confidence mappings that need human review.
ISO 27001CoverageConfidenceNo real time visibility into whether cloud infrastructure actually matches what policies require. Misconfigurations drift silently until an auditor or an attacker discovers them.
A security engineer connects Verifod to their AWS account via a read only IAM Role. The Live Dashboard shows real time PASS/FAIL status for each control. The engineer drills into a failed control to see the specific misconfigured resource.
AWSReal TimePASS/FAILThe most dangerous compliance gap is invisible: controls that pass on paper but fail in production. Legacy GRC tools track documentation; they cannot tell if infrastructure actually follows the policy.
The CISO runs the Integrity Gap Engine to compare what the security policy says against what the live infrastructure actually enforces. The report surfaces "False Compliance" items (controls that pass on paper but fail in reality) along with a False Compliance Index score. The CISO prioritizes the critical gaps for remediation.
False ComplianceFCIGap AnalysisIntegrity gaps are discovered but never closed. Without a structured workflow to assign, track, and verify fixes, compliance issues fall through the cracks between teams.
A security analyst imports all integrity gaps as remediation tasks via "Import All from Integrity Report". They assign tasks to team members, track status through Open → In Progress → Resolved → Closed, attach evidence files, and run run audits to verify closure.
Task ManagementEvidenceRe AuditProcurement onboards vendors without visibility into security posture. Manual risk assessments take weeks, and by the time they're done, the vendor already has access to sensitive data.
Before engaging a new SaaS vendor, the procurement officer enters the vendor's name into the Vendor Risk Profiler. The system aggregates external threat intelligence including breach history, known vulnerabilities, and security incidents. The officer saves the vendor, applies a risk treatment, and documents the rationale.
Threat IntelRisk ScoreTreatmentRecurring compliance activities (AD reviews, policy audits, access recertifications) are tracked in spreadsheets with no enforcement. Important checks slip quarter after quarter.
The compliance administrator configures recurring checks (AD integrity, policy review, third party risk, vulnerability scanning, user access review) with quarterly frequency. The system evaluates automatically each check based on system data and flags overdue or failing items, prompting the team to take action.
RecurringAuto EvaluateOverdueCloud scanning covers AWS, Azure, and GCP, but on prem infrastructure behind the firewall remains a black hole. AD drift, unpatched workstations, and network misconfigurations go undetected.
An IT administrator deploys the Verifod agent to a Windows server in a remote branch office. The agent authenticates via WebSocket, scans Active Directory for domain controllers, user accounts, and group policies, and sends results back. The admin views agent status, triggers manual scans, and reviews collected AD data from the central dashboard.
AgentAD ScanWebSocketHundreds of hours wasted manually filling vendor security questionnaires, answering the same questions across dozens of assessments. This busywork delays procurement and drains resources from actual risk work.
A compliance lead receives a 50 question security questionnaire from a prospective customer. With the Verifod Chrome extension, they click "Auto Fill". The extension matches each question against the Answer Library using Jaccard similarity, fills in known answers with confidence scores, and flags unmatched questions for manual review. What used to take 8 hours takes 20 minutes.
Chrome ExtensionAnswer LibraryAuto FillCreating tailored security questionnaires for each new vendor is manual and inconsistent. Generic templates miss vendor specific risks, and there's no easy way to send, track, and score responses.
A compliance lead describes the service a new data processor will provide. The AI Form Generator produces a tailored security questionnaire. The lead sends the shareable link to the vendor, who submits answers without needing an account. The system computes a risk score and surfaces concerning answers.
AI GeneratorShareable LinkRisk ScoreCompliance tasks get assigned but never acted on because team members don't know about them. Emails get buried, and there's no central place to see what's pending or overdue.
A remediation task is assigned to a team member. They receive an in app notification with an unread badge on the bell icon. Opening the dropdown shows the notification text; clicking it navigates directly to the Remediation Board. The user marks it as read, and the badge count decreases.
Real TimeBadgeNavigationBoard meetings and regulatory filings require comprehensive compliance reports, but compiling data from policy, infrastructure, vendors, and remediation takes days of manual work.
Before a regulatory filing deadline, the compliance manager generates a comprehensive PDF report covering policy coverage, live state results, integrity gaps, vendor risks, and remediation progress. The report is downloaded and submitted as evidence of the organisation's compliance posture.
PDFExportAudit EvidenceMSPs and platform admins managing multiple tenants have no unified view. They log into each tenant separately, wasting hours on context switching just to check health and activity.
A platform administrator creates a new tenant for an onboarding customer, monitors real time login activity across all organisations, reviews suspicious alerts, and manages support tickets, all from a single super admin panel.
Multi TenantSuper AdminMonitoringWeb applications ship with security flaws that go unnoticed until attackers exploit them. Legacy point-in-time pentests go stale quickly, leaving SQL injection, XSS, and broken access control exposed between assessments.
A security engineer runs an on-demand scan of a customer facing web application. Verifod tests it against the OWASP Top 10, scoring each finding by severity with payload and evidence. High risk findings flow into the Remediation Board as tasks, and results are mapped to the relevant compliance controls for the next audit.
OWASP Top 10SQL InjectionXSSRemediationAsset registers live in spreadsheets that quickly go stale. Nobody knows what's deployed, who owns it, or whether it's still in production, creating blind spots for compliance, patching, and incident response.
An IT asset manager maintains a central inventory of hardware, software, and cloud assets. They add assets manually, search and filter by any field, and paginate results. For bulk onboarding, they upload an Excel spreadsheet; the system detects asset types from raw values. A CMDB integration endpoint is available for future automated sync from ServiceNow.
Excel ImportCMDBAsset TrackingInfrastructure changes are made without proper review or audit trail. Unapproved changes introduce security holes and compliance violations, but manual gating processes slow operations and frustrate teams.
An IT operations lead initiates a change request for a firewall firmware upgrade. A multi step approval chain is triggered: IT manager approves the plan, security validates no policy violations, and compliance confirms audit trail completeness. Each approver can approve or reject with comments. If rejected, the change reverts to draft. All approvals transition it to "approved" for implementation.
Approval WorkflowChange ControlAudit TrailThe GRC platform becomes another silo if it doesn't connect to existing tools. Teams resist another dashboard, and compliance data stays isolated from the ITSM, messaging, and project tools they use daily.
A GRC administrator configures prebuilt integrations with ServiceNow (REST API), Jira (bidirectional task sync), Slack, and Microsoft Teams (compliance alerts). Each integration has a test connection button and enable/disable toggle. Integrations are per tenant, allowing MSPs to manage connector settings independently for each client.
ServiceNowJiraSlackTeamsExecutives get compliance updates in dense, technical dashboards built for specialists. The board can't tell whether the GRC programme is healthy, improving, or drifting — until an audit or an incident forces the question.
A CEO opens the Leadership Report before a board meeting. Verifod aggregates live data into a single GRC score with an A–F grade and maturity level, nine domain scores, an internal vs external audit comparison, per-framework compliance, and a six-month trend. Org-unit owners see exactly which teams are behind on tasks and findings. The board leaves with the same picture as the CISO — no manual deck, no reconciliation.
GRC ScoreExecutiveTrendA–F GradeGeneric GRC platforms don't understand local regulations. A Nigerian bank must manually map controls across CBN, NDPR, and PCI DSS with no industry specific guidance. Same for oil & gas (NUPRC), healthcare (NAFDAC), and telecoms (NCC).
A Nigerian bank manages CBN regulations, PCI DSS for card operations, and NDPR for data protection. A fintech connects AWS infrastructure to map SOC 2 controls against live configurations. An oil & gas operator tracks NUPRC environmental compliance alongside ISO 14001. Each vertical gets industry specific control mappings and regulatory references.
BankingFintechOil & GasHealthcareSee Verifod in action tailored to your industry, frameworks, and workflows.
No sales pitch. Just a focused walkthrough of how Verifod fits your environment.